[quote name='Mirko Boeddecker' date='Mar 13 2006, 01:28 AM']So to me the question still remains: Will they buy one roll of 220 film if two rolls of 120 film are cheaper ?
[right][post="7085"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]
I will buy 220 film if a 220 roll costs less than three times the price of a 120 roll.
I believe that Fuji is the manufacturer to convince about a run of Acros in 220. They make so many different color films in 220, they seem to be committed to it. I buy my Fuji 220 film in the UK by the way, where it actually costs about twice as much per roll as 120 film. In Deutschland ist es mehr wie dreimal so teuer.
I also believe that there is no point in trying to convince manufacturers that don't make 220 film at all. An investment in equipment is required, and different kind of paper is needed. It is much easier and more cost effective to make a 220 film when you already have all the equipment and supplies. That means, Kodak and Fuji are the ones who should be asked to do it.
(This post was last modified: 14-03-2006, 05:55 PM by Petzi.)
[right][post="7085"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]
I will buy 220 film if a 220 roll costs less than three times the price of a 120 roll.
I believe that Fuji is the manufacturer to convince about a run of Acros in 220. They make so many different color films in 220, they seem to be committed to it. I buy my Fuji 220 film in the UK by the way, where it actually costs about twice as much per roll as 120 film. In Deutschland ist es mehr wie dreimal so teuer.
I also believe that there is no point in trying to convince manufacturers that don't make 220 film at all. An investment in equipment is required, and different kind of paper is needed. It is much easier and more cost effective to make a 220 film when you already have all the equipment and supplies. That means, Kodak and Fuji are the ones who should be asked to do it.
