Looking for help. I’ve recently started using the ADOX MCP310. My Heiland Splitgrade system (version 2.7 C) has a calibration for it. However, based on this calibration, I’ve calculated significant correction values for my system at the paper level (T = 0; G = +1.7).
As I am not sure whether I have calculated the correction factors correctly, I would appreciate hearing about your experiences. Do you find the standard Heiland calibration sufficient, or what are your correction values? Many thanks.
Hello,
I also use the Heiland Splitgrade (MCP channel, ver. 7) but so far only for the MCC110. I’ve also noticed deviations, but more in the -3/10 range for T. My developer is Rollei’s RPN. I’ll be switching to Adox Adotol NE and WA soon, though.
+1.7 in the gradient is quite a lot. I’ll test that out with the MCP myself soon.
But if that’s the norm for you, you could save the deviations (gradient correction +1.7). Then it should work.
There’s a group on Flickr for ADOX ->
http://www.flickr.com/groups/adox/pool/
Perhaps there are also users there who use the Splitgrade + MCP and can share their experiences with you. The same goes for ->
http://www.flickr.com/groups/1173790@N25/ (group for MCC)
Best regards,
Serge
