Hi Mirko,
That’s actually quite interesting, as I’d posted about a fault that sounds very similar, at least in the description:
http://www.fotolaborforum.eu/index.php?showtopic=1246
. It’s just that (almost) everything about the process is different.
Different film (CHM400)
Developer (Tanol)
Fixer (ATS, alk)
No wetting agent, just water from a dehumidifier as the final bath...
Scan of the positive (print) in the linked post.
I actually wanted to keep using/reordering the CHM400, but after three rolls now, it’s not really fun without a concrete new idea of where to look next.
Regards
Martin
I’d be happy to provide a scan of the negative on request.