Hi Franz,
Tell me, what’s got into you? You’re just listing steel wool as a filling here without mentioning the concerns surrounding this method :o
So, to get the environmental debate started. Filling only makes sense if the container can be filled almost completely (otherwise it’s just greenwashing). Steel wool has already been ruled out as a method here on numerous occasions because (Franz, I’ll just quote you from another forum):
On the subject of steel wool: I don’t know how the proponents of this solution dispose of their waste, what they use to degrease the stuff, or whether they really use *iron* shavings or rather unsuitable but cheap steel shavings made of alloyed steel from the nearest turning shop or supermarket. ‘Abrazo’ isn’t up to scratch, you see.
But one thing does interest me: how the advocates of this fixing bath filling process treat their resulting sludge to make it suitable for disposal. Firstly, quantitative silver plating is not possible (just look at the redox potentials, consider what happens on which surface, and you’ll conclude that silver still remains in solution. Let’s not even get started on complex stability constants...). Secondly, what’s usually on offer as “iron wool” is actually “steel wool”, which merely adds chromium and nickel to the silver in the effluent. That’s true applied ecology – after all, no genuinely environmentally conscious fellow human being understands the term “free corrosion potential” anyway.
:)
Best regards and take care
Richard