Hi Sven,
I got the idea of waxing when I was reading the good old Croy (Dr Otto Croy, *Enlargement with All the Finesses*).
I’ll just copy one of my posts from elsewhere here – that’ll save me having to type it all out again:
Here goes:
Hi Karl Heinz,
thanks for letting us know about the shelf life! I’ve always felt a bit guilty when waxing baryta paper (using Erdal shoe polish with beeswax, EAN: 4 001499 010651).
Like you, I got the tip from the old Croy book ‘Enlarging with All the Finesses’. I’ll copy the relevant chapter here (with my comments in square brackets):
-->
Varnishing and waxing the prints
Wet enlargements that are satisfactory in tonal range and density often look lacklustre after drying. They have, as they say, ‘sunk in’. Only high-gloss papers are free from this; deep-matt papers, on the other hand, sink in the most.
If the surface is given a gloss afterwards, the brilliance of the new image is restored to a certain extent. This is achieved by waxing or varnishing the prints.
To wax the picture, it is rubbed with so-called ‘Cerat’, a wax paste containing a ‘gloss resin’ to achieve a special sheen.
Cerat:
White wax: 100g
Turpentine (pure): 100g
Dammar resin (or synthetic resin, e.g. maleic resin): 4g
[On dammar resin:
http://www.umweltlexikon-online.de/fp/arch.../Dammarharz.php
]
(The wax and turpentine are first melted in a bain-marie until a homogeneous liquid is formed, in which the dammar resin is then dissolved.)
Once cooled, a paste remains; take a small amount of this onto a flannel cloth and rub it over the pictures until they have taken on a faint sheen. Irregularities in the surface caused by retouching paint or scraping usually disappear in the process, and the picture becomes more brilliant and three-dimensional.
Images to be treated with Cerat must not have been retouched with positive retouching pencils, as the retouching would be wiped away during polishing. Retouching with the pencil can only be carried out after polishing, although it will then no longer adhere as well.
Positive varnishes [you probably meant the aggressive solvent]
An even stronger sheen and thus a more intense deepening of the shadows is achieved by varnishing the prints. Various positive varnishes are available commercially for this purpose, which, depending on their composition, produce surfaces with varying degrees of gloss. They can be poured over the flat print, applied with a brush or – for the most even result – sprayed on with a spray bottle.
Unfortunately, some commercial positive varnishes contain linseed oil or another greasy oil. If the emulsion has been scraped beforehand, the grease penetrates the paper felt at that point and causes a dark, spreading stain that can no longer be removed. The following recipe is a good one:
Gloss varnish for pouring and brushing on:
Dammar resin: 10g
Petrol (pure): 75cc
Sulphur ether: 75cc
[Sulphur ether is now called ‘dimethyl sulphide’; it is highly skin-permeable, carcinogenic as hell and extremely flammable!!!]
Pour the varnish over the picture and let the excess drip off over a corner. The pictures will be dry after about 24 hours. [And the lab technician may well suffer severe liver damage!] During dilution with the same amount of petrol, the varnish can also be applied with a brush, although this tends to result in an uneven finish. Due to its high flammability, it is less suitable for spraying. [To put it mildly. As an aerosol, the stuff is likely to be *spontaneously combustible*!]
<--
So says the old master :-) (Prof. Dr Otto Croy, Vergrößern mit allen Finessen, Heering-Verlag in Seebruck am Chiemsee, 76,000–85,000 copies, 1966, pp. 205ff)
The typos are mine and were accidentally slipped in whilst copying.
So I gave it a go with solvent-free shoe polish. I like it, and it also works well for removing lint from the drying cloth or dust from ‘cellar drying’ in the wooden frame. What’s more, fingerprints are no longer a problem, as you can polish them off again.
Done.
Best regards,
Franz