michael-kielgmxnet
Hi Mario,
I developed a roll of film using Atomal 1+2 many years ago. The results were good, perhaps just a touch low on contrast, but that can be easily compensated for with the gradient during enlargement.
I think I used the recommended development time for the stock solution multiplied by 1.7 back then, but as I said, it was quite a long time ago, so I wouldn’t guarantee it.
Best regards,
Michael
GX680
I tested this combination for the first time last weekend.
€
For the light-mixing box enlarger, I used 8 mins * 2 = 16 mins at 20°C with Atonal 1+2.
The result was far too low in contrast for my liking; on my second attempt, I would develop for 15–20% longer.
€
I won’t have any results with density curves until I’ve settled on a film/developer combination that produces a nice, sharp ‘look’.
Currently, I’m using FP4+ in FX-39 for 6x8 and 6x9 prints enlarged to 30x40. €
